Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00106
Original file (PD2013 00106.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME:    CASE: PD1300106
BRANCH OF SERVICE: army  BOARD DATE: 20120507
SEPARATION DATE: 20030416


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty PFC/E-3 (68Y10/Basic Trainee) medically separated for a left (non-dominant) upper extremity condition. He sustained a fracture to his left humeral shaft during basic training in October 2002, requiring surgical fixation. He was subsequently diagnosed with osteopetrosis (an inherited bone disease vulnerable to fractures). The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent U3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded the left humerus fracture (surgical residuals) and osteopetrosis as separate conditions to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB (IPEB) combined the submissions as a single unfitting condition characterized as “chronic left upper extremity pain following fracture of the humerus ... with an underlying inherited disorder (osteopetrosis)” recognizing the condition existed prior to service (EPTS) factor as permanently service aggravated. The condition was rated 0%, citing criteria of the the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated with a 0% disability rating.


CI CONTENTION: “Still having issues with shoulder including weakness and lost range of motion.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB, when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting left shoulder condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. The Board acknowledges the impairment with which the CI’s service-connected condition continues to burden him, but notes that the Disability Evaluation System (DES) has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), operating under a different set of laws. Post-separation evidence is probative to the Board’s recommendations only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20030318
 VA (4 Mos Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Residuals, Left Humeral Fracture 5099-5003 0% Residuals, Left Humeral Fracture 5202 0% STR*
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 0%
Derived from VA Ratin g Decision (VARD) dated 200 30730 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS ) .
* VA rating derived from Service treatment record (STR); no VA rating examination .


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Left Upper Extremity Condition. The CI was diagnosed with a displaced fracture of the proximal left humerus after a fall, and underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Post-operative imaging revealed some persistent mild angulation with incomplete healing and a previously unrecognized non-displaced fracture of the tuberosity (articulation with the shoulder joint). Further surgical intervention was judged to be imprudent, especially considering the potential operative complications due to the now-recognized osteopetrosis. The CI regained range-of-motion (ROM) with physical therapy, but was left with persistent pain interfering with function. The narrative summary (NARSUM) noted, “Currently ... he has no pain at rest or with activities of daily living. However, with strenuous activity he does have pain in his left shoulder as well as an achiness.” The physical exam documented no tenderness, no atrophy, and full strength. The neurologic exam was otherwise normal. ROM measurements were active abduction to 160 degrees (normal 180 degrees, minimal compensable 90 degrees) and forward flexion to 180 degrees (normal). Passive abduction was 180 degrees.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. Members first agreed that any separate disability intrinsic to the osteopetrosis condition is appropriately subsumed in a single disability rating for the left upper extremity impairment in evidence as was determined by both the PEB and VA. Although that condition may have contributed to the overall “unfitness,” the clinical course intrinsic to osteopetrosis itself was clearly unaltered by military service (i.e., not permanently service aggravated). The PEB indicated that its 0% rating was for “pain, slight,” per the USAPDA pain policy, under the analogous code 5003 (degenerative arthritis). The VA rated under code 5202 (humerus, other impairment of), judging that the minimum compensable (20%) criteria of either “moderate malunion” or “recurrent dislocation” were not satisfied. Members agreed that 5202 is clinically compatible with the diagnosis and that even applying it analogously for disability, a compensable rating cannot by justified by the evidence. Members then deliberated the options for achieving at least the minimum 10% under an analogous 5003 code; code 5310 (traumatic arthritis was suggested. Since no minimum rating was achievable based on ROM criteria, it would require application of either VASRD §4.59 (painful motion) or §4.40 (functional loss). Member consensus was that painful motion was not in evidence. Regarding functional loss, the NARSUM clearly stipulated that pain was present only with strenuous activities. Member consensus was that this limitation was not of sufficient social or occupational impact to meet a reasonable threshold for application of §4.40. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), member consensus was that no rating greater than 0% was supported IAW VASRD §4.71a criteria; the Board thus concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the left upper extremity condition.




BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating the left upper extremity condition was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the left upper extremity condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board by a vote of 2:1 recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. The single voter for dissent (who recommended a 10% rating under code 5099-5010) did not elect to submit a minority opinion. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Left Upper Extremity Pain Following Fracture of the Humerus 5099-5003 0%
COMBINED
 0%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120225, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




         Physical Disability Board of Review


 SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB),

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130010948 (PD201300106)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                 
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01659

    Original file (PD2012 01659.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He continued to report snapping and popping of shoulder, and loss of strength in left hand, but no pain or numbness below the elbow, and stated he could not use his left hand at all due to pain and weakness.On examination, gait was normal; flexion was recorded at 170 degrees, abduction of 180. The Board noted this to be inconsistent with the service treatment records (STRs) which recorded no limitation of motion.After discussion, the Board agreed the probative value of the NARSUM was...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02218

    Original file (PD-2013-02218.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The upper extremity condition, characterized as “right shoulder stiffness, bilateral upper extremity pain and residual disability” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “left non-dominant forearm and hand injury, with reduced grip strength and chronic left upper extremity pain,”as unfitting rated 10% and 10%, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD)and the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01626

    Original file (PD 2012 01626.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, the Board considered the two conditions for separate disability ratings. The CI had painful limited ROM of the right shoulder, without evidence of instability following surgery. In the matter of the bilateral shoulder condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability ratings as follow: an unfitting right shoulder condition rated 10%, coded 5201 and an unfitting left shoulder condition, rated 0%, coded 5202, both IAW VASRD §4.71a.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01955

    Original file (PD-2013-01955.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The PEB assigned a 20% rating using code 5201 (Arm limitation of motion) for limitation and weakness of the right upper extremity s/p IED blast fracturing the humerus with an active ROM recorded at 90 degrees in its...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01870

    Original file (PD-2014-01870.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Right Shoulder Pain5299-520220%Acromioclavicular Separation of the R/Shoulder w/Tendinitis, Bursitis, and Impingement520120%20061218Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 9 RATING: 20%RATING: 40% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20080904(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). Chronic Right Shoulder Pain Condition . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02020

    Original file (PD-2014-02020.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Right Shoulder Condition . The PEB chose to rate the condition at 0%, analogous to 5003 (degenerative arthritis) for slight and occasional pain.The VA used the same code to rate the condition at 0% citing the lack of clinical findings to support a compensable evaluation (the CI was a no show).In accordance with DoDI 6040.44, the Board is required to recommend a rating IAW the VASRD in effect at the time of separation. The Board undertook a careful review of the record in evidence and noted...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01881

    Original file (PD2012 01881.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded severe left shoulder pain, status post (s/p) surgery as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501.The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication.The PEB adjudicated chronic pain left shoulder as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and theUS Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 10% disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01884

    Original file (PD-2014-01884.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The TDRL’s re-evaluation IPEB adjudicated the right wrist, right knee and left shoulder as a single unfitting condition, rated at 20%. However, the PEB combined the condition of the right hand with the right knee and left shoulder and rated the conditions under the pain policy. In the matter of the left rotator cuff and left shoulder pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5099-5003 IAW VASRD §4.59 at both TDRL placement and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01389

    Original file (PD 2012 01389.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Malunion of Left Clavicle. Since being out of the military, the CI had less pain in his left shoulder. The left clavicle malunion condition was adjudicated by the PEB with application of VASRD code 5203, impairment of the clavicle or scapula, and rated 10% disabling consistent with a malunion of the clavicle.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00993

    Original file (PD 2012 00993.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Chronic Right Shoulder Pain 5099-5003 20% COMBINED 20% The following documentary evidence...